Traveler vs. Tourist Argument – Breaking Stereotypes

6 Posted by - October 20, 2014 - Blog, Opinion

I’m sure that you’ve seen these quotes many times on internet…

traveler vs. tourist 2

So what’s the matter with this “traveler vs. tourist argument’? Tourists are often known as “boring”, “inconsiderate”, “bad”, “uninformed”, “traveling in the group” and travelers are “cool”, “adventurous”, “respectful”, “open minded” and in one word- “better”. These are stereotypes and many times this division is caused by snobbish behavior and thinking “I am better than you are. And my way of traveling is better than yours”. Sometimes just the way you dress or destinations you pick will make you look like a tourist or a traveler. That’s more than enough to show that this division is based on stereotypes.

Let’s see first what tourist means. The official definition describes tourist as someone who travels abroad for at least twenty-four hours. And for sociologists these both groups are perceived as tourists. But the word ‘tourist’ usually had a negative connotation since its introduction.

no tourists allowed

Travelers are known as the ones who travel to less-known and alternative places, but what they don’t seem to understand is that with that they actually pave the road for tourists and tourism industry. This is closely related to something which in tourism is called as “the stages of development of touristic regions”. In the first phase the place will be visited by individual guests who would fit the earlier description of a “traveler”, while the local population will see this as a chance for its development and that will eventually lead to the emergence of entrepreneurship. This phase is then replaced by “the mass tourism phase” where tourists pop in. New accommodation facilities, restaurants and bars are being opened which are adapted to the habits of the visitors. As you can see travelers will always pave the road for tourists, so this division is unfounded.

So why are travelers so bothered by tourists? In the past tourism was reserved only for the upper class and those who were traveling had a special status. Maybe travelers are bothered by tourists because they make them feel less special? But travel is no longer reserved for the upper class. Today everybody travels and the unknown almost doesn’t exist. Nowadays people travel to some of the unfriendliest places on Earth such as the Antarctic.

For example backpackers often travel to undeveloped areas and contribute economically but that’s not always the case. Many times they act as exploiters of local resources and they tend to socialize more with other backpackers than with the locals. Also there are many countries which are against this type of travel, like Bhutan where you won’t find a backpacking culture.

Then there are those type of tourists who walk around carrying their cameras and look a bit annoying, but they also do their best to learn the local customs and culture and who behave more cautiously to the local population which again shows us that this dichotomy is unfounded.

Everything is pretty individual and at the end of the day it doesn’t matter if you call yourself a tourist or a traveler. What’s important is the way you travel. If you improve the world we live in, if you treat the local culture with respect, if you learn new things while you travel and make contacts with the locals then it doesn’t matter if you are a traveler or a tourist. What is more important is our behavior and the traces we leave behind.

email

5 Comments

  • ratm89 October 20, 2014 - 11:38 pm Reply

    I would say a tourist is someone who travels with intent to visit certain places/things, through a set plan and something more short-term. I’d say a traveler is much more “nomadic” in definition, people who travel not through any direct set plan but with an intent to immerse themselves in a culture, to “experience” new things and to leave somewhere with memories and stories… and not with 1000 photographs of the Eiffel Tower for example. That’s just my opinion.. I think also attitude has something to do with it. ๐Ÿ™‚

    • Zorica October 21, 2014 - 12:00 am Reply

      Thanks for the comment! That’s kind of true what you say but whether someone wants to travel short-term or long-term is again a matter of personal choice and preference no? ๐Ÿ™‚ I don’t think it’s something that should make one person better than the other. And I will just give an example, there are tourists who travel in a group and let’s say they visit an undeveloped area and they decide to donate money and on the other side travelers which you say are more “nomadic” in definition, who only hang out with other backpackers and don’t try to learn anything new which is also not exactly immersing into culture. Anyway, my point is, there are no clearly defined boundaries and I think this matter is a subject of individuality.

    • Tea October 22, 2014 - 6:35 pm Reply

      Amen. To me a tourist is someone who goes on eg city trip. And travelers are people who travel around for a longer period of time. So you can be both …

      • ratm89 October 23, 2014 - 3:37 pm Reply

        Yes! For me, I think that intent and desire can define the difference between the two. Maybe very stereotypical: Do you leave a place with expensive tours, photographs of monuments and city souvenirs? Or with new friends, cultural experiences and stories? It can of course be a mixture of both (I like such debates) ๐Ÿ™‚

        • Zorica October 24, 2014 - 4:00 pm Reply

          I love how you’ve put that. Of course you can have a mix of both, because boundaries are unclear!

    Leave a reply